The title of the finding page for EVI-163 and everywhere the finding is linked, including the archive and related finding pages. The wording was on faelledsporet.dk from 25 September 2026.

It said

Staten vurderede i juni 2024, at der formentlig er bilag IV-arter på arealet

It now says

Staten vurderede i juni 2024, at der på arealet kan være rasteområder for bilag IV-arter

The title said more than the source. The memo says there “may be resting areas” for Annex IV species, “probably” the European green toad, the great crested newt and foraging bats. The word probably concerns which species it might be, not whether they are on the site. The title turned a possibility into a probability.

EVI-163

Front page theme 002, “The state cannot deliver the land”, in Danish and English. The wording was on faelledsporet.dk from August 2026.

It said

Staten vurderer sig erstatningspligtig, og hvor stor en kompensation ville være, ved ingen.

It now says

Staten vurderer sig erstatningspligtig. Hvor stor en kompensation ville være, siger staten selv, at den ikke kender, og dens notat om udgifterne ved en opsigelse er undtaget fra aktindsigt.

The sentence said that nobody knows the size of a compensation. The Danish Nature Agency has itself written that it does not know. But the state holds a memo on the costs of a termination, which it withholds from freedom of information requests, and whether that memo contains an amount is not known. The sentence said more than the documents support. The same correction has been made to the English text.

EVI-091 · EVI-158 · EVI-175

The page for EVI-091, the box “What this does not prove”. The wording was on faelledsporet.dk from 23 August 2026.

It said

Der findes fortsat ikke noget beløb, hverken hos kommunen eller hos staten.

It now says

Noget beløb er ikke offentliggjort, hverken af kommunen eller af staten. Statens notat om udgifterne ved en opsigelse er undtaget fra aktindsigt.

The caveat said that no amount exists at the state. It has since emerged that the state holds a memo on the costs of a termination and withholds it from freedom of information requests. Whether it contains an amount is not known. “Does not exist” was therefore too strong. “Not made public” is what the documents support.

EVI-091 · EVI-158 · EVI-175

The front page headline and the site description shown in search results and when shared, in Danish and English. The wording was on faelledsporet.dk from August 2026.

It said

Eventplads til 60.000 mennesker på fredet natur

It now says

Eventplads til op mod 60.000 mennesker på fredet natur

The proposal the City Council voted on on 25 June 2026 says “up to 60,000 people”. On 2 October 2026 the city confirmed that no documents set a precise number of attendees, and that capacity will be set at a later stage. The headline gave the number as fixed. The same correction has been made to the description and the English headline.

EVI-001 · EVI-171

Front page, the clock, the card for the request about the six documents the Danish Nature Agency withheld in full (SPG-014). On faelledsporet.dk from 24 September 2026.

It said

Besvaret 22. september 2026

It now says

Delvist besvaret 22. september 2026. De øvrige punkter er ikke besvaret, og der er ikke oplyst en dato for, hvornår de bliver det.

The Danish Nature Agency's decision of 22 September 2026 granted full access to some of the documents and partial access with redactions to the rest. It was appealed on 24 September. The card showed it as answered without qualification, because the field for a partial answer was not filled in when the decision was entered. The same error counted the request as fully answered in the number at the top of the clock.

Front page, the number at the top of the clock. The wording was on faelledsporet.dk from 21 August 2026, the numbers most recently from 24 September 2026.

It said

3 anmodninger om aktindsigt uden svar overhovedet, 4 besvaret delvist.

It now says

1 anmodning om aktindsigt er over fristen uden svar, og 4 er kun besvaret delvist.

The number counted a question put through a political group (SPG-013) as a freedom of information request, which it is not, and it counted two requests sent the previous evening, 24 September, as unanswered alongside one whose deadline expired on 31 August. The number now shows only freedom of information requests, and under unanswered only those past their deadline. The individual requests are unchanged in the clock.

The page /opslag/, the closing lines of all three shareable posts

It said

Mandag den 14. september klokken 12 er fristen for ændringsforslag til budgettet. […] Skriv til ét byrådsmedlem inden da.

It now says

Onsdag den 23. september klokken 12 er fristen for underændringsforslag til budgettet. […] Der ligger en færdig forslagstekst på faelledsporet.dk/forslaget. Den er fri at bruge. Skriv til ét byrådsmedlem inden fristen.

All three posts ended with a deadline that expired on 14 September at 12.00. It was correct when the posts were written on 12 September, and wrong for the eight days that followed. The page's introduction was corrected on 18 September, but the posts' own text was deliberately left standing because it had been true on its own date. That was the wrong call. The page is a sharing tool: the text exists to be copied and posted in a citizen's own name, so it must be right now, not then. Anyone who shared a post after the 14th told their network about a deadline that had already passed and asked them to write before it. The original wording is kept on each post. Each post now carries its date, and the build refuses to pass quietly if a deadline inside a post's text has expired.

The letter tool at /skriv/, the recipient group Frie Grønne (Q)

It said

Frie Grønne (Q) · 1 at vælge imellem · Sikandar Siddique

It now says

Gruppen vises ikke længere. Frie Grønnes eneste medlem af Borgerrepræsentationen udtrådte den 17. september 2026, og hvem der er indtrådt i stedet, er ikke slået op ved kilden. Der tilbydes ingen modtager, før navn og mailadresse står dokumenteret.

Sikandar Siddique left the City Council on 17 September 2026, as recorded in item 2 of the agenda for the council meeting that day. For four days the tool went on offering him as the only recipient under Frie Grønne. A citizen who picked him in that window wrote to someone who no longer sat on the council and, rightly, received no reply. The fault is ours: the register behind the tool is a snapshot from 30 July and had no way of catching a departure. It now has a field for it, and a departed member is no longer shown anywhere on the site.

The sharing page, the introduction above the posts. Stood on faelledsporet.dk from 12 September to 18 September 2026.

It said

Fristen for ændringsforslag til budgettet for 2027 er mandag den 14. september kl. 12.00. Herunder er 3 opslag om sagen. Hvert af dem står på et dokument, du selv kan se efter i arkivet.

It now says

Fristen for ændringsforslag til budgettet for 2027 var den 14. september. Fristen for underændringsforslag er onsdag den 23. september kl. 12.00, og budgettet vedtages endeligt den 1. oktober. Opslagene herunder er skrevet før den første frist og nævner den. Hvert af dem står på et dokument, du selv kan se efter i arkivet.

The sentence was true when written on 12 September and became untrue at noon on 14 September, when the deadline passed. It then stood in the present tense for four days. No single piece of information in it was invented: the deadline for amendments was Monday 14 September at 12.00. But a deadline written in the present tense is not a statement about a date, it is a message about how much time is left, and that is its entire function at the top of the page that asks people to share something and write to a council member. A reader opening the page on 15, 16, 17 or 18 September could conclude that the window had closed, and do nothing. That was wrong. The deadline for sub-amendments is Wednesday 23 September at 12.00, set by the City Council on 27 August 2026, item 3, resolution point 9. This is the same form of error as the countdown that stood in negative numbers from 28 August to 10 September, and it is here for the same reason: a reader may have acted on it.

Front page, the calendar, the entry for the meeting of 20 August 2026

It said

Sidste ordinære møde før budgettets 1. behandling. Et medlemsforslag om arealet skal stilles her for at blive behandlet inden budgettet.

It now says

Sidste ordinære møde før budgettets 1. behandling. Et medlemsforslag om arealet skulle have været stillet her for at blive behandlet inden budgettet. Fristen er passeret, og der blev ikke stillet noget. Budgetaftalen for 2027 blev indgået den 3. september 2026.

The sentence was written in the imperative about a deadline that expired on 20 August 2026. It stood for three weeks after the deadline passed, and after the budget agreement was struck on 3 September. A reader could have believed there was still time to have a member's motion heard before the budget, and planned accordingly. The date and the meeting are unchanged. Only the tense is corrected, and what actually happened is now stated.

EVI-131

Front page, the key figure next to 2047

It said

0 artskortlægninger er planlagt

It now says

2 sætninger om strengt beskyttede arter i det notat, politikerne fik. Ingen af dem nævner et besøg på stedet

The figure was true when written and became untrue on 3 September 2026, when the 2027 budget agreement commissioned the survey of particularly vulnerable and threatened species. It stood wrong for seven days, on the same page as theme 004, which was corrected the same day and says the opposite. The figure now states something the agreement did not change: the section on Annex IV species in the memo of 26 February 2024, given to the Finance Committee and the City Council as appendix 4, consists of two sentences, and neither refers to fieldwork, a site visit or a report.

EVI-055 · EVI-039 · EVI-134

The English front page, the key figure next to 2047

It said

0 species surveys carried out before the decision

It now says

2 sentences on strictly protected species in the memo the politicians were given. Neither mentions a site visit

The Danish version of this same key figure was corrected on 26 August 2026, because the monitoring fieldwork took place before the decision of 25 June 2026. The correction was never carried over to the English front page, which therefore carried the retired wording for fifteen days, from 26 August to 10 September. No validator noticed that the two languages had drifted apart. Both languages now say the same thing.

EVI-055 · EVI-039 · EVI-100

Front page, theme 004 on species, final sentence

It said

En kortlægning af arterne er ikke planlagt.

It now says

Kommunen oplyste den 4. august 2026, at en kortlægning ikke var planlagt. Budgetaftalen for 2027 bestiller den den 3. september 2026, godt to måneder efter at beslutningen var truffet.

The sentence was true when written and became untrue on 3 September 2026. The 2027 budget agreement requires the functional programme to survey particularly vulnerable and threatened species on the golf course site. Written in the present tense, the sentence told readers something false about the situation today. It stood wrong for seven days, from the budget agreement on 3 September to the correction on 10 September. The sentence is now dated to the city's reply of 4 August 2026. This is not a concession that the city changed its account: on 4 August no survey was planned, and on 3 September one was commissioned. The correction happened in two steps on the same day. First the sentence was dated so it no longer asserted anything about the present. Once the document proving the commission was approved and published the same afternoon, the sentence was given its full information. The intermediate wording stood for less than a day.

EVI-031 · EVI-068 · EVI-134

Forsiden, linjen under nøgletallene, og nedtællingen i toppen. Stod på faelledsporet.dk fra den 28. august til den 10. september 2026.

It said

-13 dage til 1. behandling af budgettet den 27. august 2026. Anden og sidste behandling er 1. oktober.

It now says

21 dage til 2. behandling af budgettet den 1. oktober 2026, hvor budgettet vedtages endeligt. 1. behandling var den 27. august 2026.

Konstanten BUDGET i byggescriptet pegede på 27. august 2026. Da datoen passerede, talte forsiden ned i negative tal til et møde, der havde været. Ingen enkeltoplysning var usand: 1. behandling var den 27. august, og 2. behandling den 1. oktober stod der også. Men en nedtælling er ikke en oplysning, den er en besked om, hvor lang tid der er tilbage, og det er hele dens funktion på siden. I fjorten dage fortalte den, at tiden var udløbet. En læser, der skimmede den og lod være med at skrive til et medlem af Borgerrepræsentationen, handlede forkert på grund af vores side. Derfor står den her og ikke blandt de interne rettelser.

Front page, theme 004 on species, and the document page EVI-101

It said

På ynglefugle er stedet nummer to af 45 lokaliteter i hele København. Målt på samlet artsrigdom er det nummer 19 af 57

It now says

På ynglefugle er stedet blandt de fem artsrigeste af 45 lokaliteter i hele København, på en delt tredjeplads. Målt på samlet artsrigdom er det nummer 21 af 57

The ranking counted species that the city's own dataset marks as excluded, on the golf course the invasive pheasant. The bird report itself states under table 3-4 that non-native species are not included in the totals. The report's own count gives 18 species and a joint third place, and that quote has been in EVI-030 all along. Counted by the same rule, overall species richness is 64 species and 21st of 57, not 70 and 19th. The error was identified in the raw-data review of 26 August, but the correction was only entered on 31 August, after the figure was on its way into a letter. The number that helped the case most was also the one that was miscounted.

EVI-030 · EVI-100 · EVI-101

Front page, theme 004 on species, the headline

It said

Ingen har undersøgt, hvad der lever derude

It now says

Arterne er talt. De er aldrig vurderet.

The headline was wrong. The city's own baseline monitoring has surveyed the locality: 86 records, 70 species, fieldwork in 2024 and 2025. The two documents proving it were listed as sources directly beneath the headline. The page contradicted itself for five days, from the species data arriving on 21 August to the correction on 26 August. What is missing is not the count. It is the assessment.

EVI-029 · EVI-100 · EVI-101

Front page, the key figure next to 2047

It said

0 kortlægninger af arterne før beslutningen

It now says

0 artskortlægninger er planlagt

The same error as in theme 004. The monitoring fieldwork took place before the decision of 25 June 2026. The figure 0 is correct about something else: the Finance Administration stated on 4 August 2026 that no species survey is planned.

EVI-031 · EVI-100

Write to them, the email tool's angle on species

It said

Arterne er ikke undersøgt. Københavns Kommunes egen baseline-monitering registrerede fem rødlistede fuglearter på arealet i 2024 og 2025. Økonomiforvaltningen oplyste den 4. august 2026, at en artskortlægning ikke er planlagt, og at den først vil være relevant i en senere fase.

It now says

Arterne er talt, men ikke vurderet. Københavns Kommunes egen baseline-monitering registrerede den 16. maj 2025 fem fuglearter med rødlistestatus på moniteringslokaliteten Golfbanen, heriblandt hættemågen i kategorien truet. Økonomiforvaltningen oplyste den 4. august 2026, at en artskortlægning ikke er planlagt, og at den først vil være relevant, hvis kommunen opnår aftale med staten om at overtage området.

Three errors in two lines. The headline was wrong for the same reason as theme 004. The birds were counted on one day, 16 May 2025, not across 2024 and 2025; the 2024 dates are botany and beetles. And the city's answer sets a condition, not a phase: that the city reaches agreement with the state to take over the area. This text matters most of all, because citizens send it on in their own name.

EVI-031 · EVI-100

Front page and English front page, the share text and the page description

It said

Fire myndigheder har vurderet det.

It now says

Kommunen vurderer selv, at der sandsynligvis ikke kan dispenseres fra fredningen.

There is no source for the number four. The Conservation Board and the Environment and Food Appeals Board assessed a golf tournament with fencing, not a festival venue. The Danish Nature Agency has stated that it has not assessed the occurrence of Annex IV species in connection with this case. The sentence appeared twice and has been replaced in both places by something a document covers.

EVI-054 · EVI-079

Front page, the section on wording

It said

Det samme ord, ni år fra hinanden. Begge citater er overborgmesterens egne offentlige ord.

It now says

Det samme ord, otte år fra hinanden. Begge citater er hendes egne offentlige ord. I 2017 var hun kandidat, ikke overborgmester.

Two errors. From 10 November 2017 to 25 June 2026 is eight years and seven months, not nine years. And she was a candidate in 2017, not Lord Mayor. That already stood in the caveat on the document's own page, two lines further down. The page contradicted itself.

EVI-007 · EVI-008

Party page for The Free Greens

It said

Partiet har ikke afgivet protokolbemærkning, fremsat medlemsforslag eller udtalt sig i en kilde, vi har fundet.

It now says

Protokolbemærkningen af 25. juni 2026 står nu på siden, som den også gør på Alternativets.

Wrong. The formal statement of 25 June 2026 was made by The Alternative and The Free Greens together. The cause was technical: the archive could attach only one party letter to a document, and the statement sat under The Alternative. The Free Greens' page therefore claimed the opposite of what the archive itself contained.

EVI-010 · EVI-069 · EVI-070

Party page for the Socialist People's Party, the label on a document from 2017

It said

forrige valgperiode. Fundet er fra før kommunalvalget i november 2025 og hører til den forrige byrådsperiode.

It now says

før valget i 2025. Fundet er fra før kommunalvalget i november 2025 og hører derfor til en tidligere byrådsperiode.

A document from 10 November 2017 is not from the previous council term. It is two terms back. The label was applied to everything older than the 2025 election, with no lower bound.

EVI-007

English front page, the key figure at 2047

It said

the year the lease runs to. The state cannot end it

It now says

the year the lease runs to. The state cannot terminate the lease

The English text went further than the Danish and further than the source. The Danish Nature Agency has stated that the lease cannot be terminated by the state, but also that intervention could happen through expropriation, a special act of law, or a voluntary agreement with the tenant. The lease can be brought to an end. Just not by termination.

EVI-089 · EVI-090

English front page, document 006

It said

we would therefore like to look into whether, in the slightly longer term, it might be possible.

It now says

we would therefore like to look into whether, in the slightly longer term, an entrance fee could be charged in the area, which would then make both a festival and golf tournaments possible.

The English rendering of the quotation from 20 December 2024 was cut in half, and the entrance fee disappeared from it. The sentence ended as an empty claim, where the Danish one carries the point.

EVI-093

English front page, the section on the parties

It said

No party hid its position.

It now says

The parties that have spoken did not hide their position.

The claim covered all ten parties. The two documents beneath it concern one.

EVI-004 · EVI-070

Front page and write page, on the Climate, Environment and Technical Committee

It said

De er kommunens naturmyndighed.

It now says

De er kommunens naturmyndighed. Plejemyndigheden på netop dette areal er dog staten, ikke kommunen.

The sentence is correct about the city in general and misleading about this particular site. The golf area lies in sub-area 2 of the conservation order, where the managing authority is the state.

EVI-025

Party pages, the heading above the documents

It said

Kun dokumenter, hvor partiet selv er afsenderen. Ingen fortolkning.

It now says

Kun dokumenter fra partiet selv eller fra et af dets medlemmer, med afsender og dato på hvert. Ingen fortolkning.

The heading did not fit three of the documents shown. An interview and an email from a single member are not the party as sender. The words No interpretation made the heading a claim that could be tested, and it failed.

EVI-007 · EVI-008 · EVI-103

The clock, the deadline on the request about the lease and finances

It said

Svarfrist 11. august 2026

It now says

Svarfrist 31. august 2026 (miljøoplysningsloven)

The deadline was calculated under the Access to Public Administration Files Act, because the request was made under it. But the Finance Administration has stated in writing that it processed the request under the Environmental Information Act, where the deadline is one month. With the wrong deadline, three timely answers, on 5, 14 and 18 August, looked late on our own page. The error hit us, and it hit the administration.

The clock, the deadline on the request about the event venue

It said

Svarfrist 11. august 2026

It now says

Svarfrist: Ikke afklaret, med begrundelsen skrevet ud

Same cause. The request of 31 July 2026 was made under both acts, and the decision of 25 August does not state under which of them it was made. Under one act the deadline would be 11 August, under the other 31 August. Until the administration states the legal basis, the page shows no deadline. We have asked.

The document page for the vote of 25 June 2026

It said

ni listebogstaver stemte for

It now says

otte listebogstaver stemte for

Our own summary counted wrong. The minutes list eight party letters. Eight plus the two that voted against makes ten, which is the number of parties on the City Council. The error was ours, not the minutes'. Corrected the same day it was found.

EVI-069

Front page, a document that should not have been shown

It said

Ordlyden er ikke bevaret.

It now says

Dokumentet er taget af forsiden.

A document marked in the archive as not for publication was on the front page for about an hour, because the front page pulled it in by a different route than the document pages. The build script now refuses to build if it happens again. The exact wording was not saved, so this entry is reconstructed from the archive's own note.

The overview of freedom of information requests has been updated with four replies from 2 to 7 October 2026 and three requests sent on 25 September 2026. The Danish Nature Agency has answered the last two questions in the request about the conservation plan for the area, and until today the front page said they were unanswered. The Finance Administration has replied about the basis for the figure of up to 60,000. The Danish Nature Agency has decided the request for the June 2024 presentation and replied to the complaints about the decisions of 1 and 22 September. The Technical and Environmental Administration has granted full access to the versions of its assessment of the golf course. No earlier statement on the site was wrong. The texts were behind.

EVI-171 · EVI-172 · EVI-173 · EVI-174

A new finding has been added, EVI-154. Lord Mayor Sisse Marie Welling writes in a joint reply to citizens on 24 September 2026 that festival activities will most likely require a change to the purpose of the conservation order. In the proposal the City Council voted on on 25 June 2026, the same sentence said a full or partial lifting. No earlier statement on the site was wrong.

EVI-131

EVI-131 · EVI-071 · EVI-066

Ten new findings have been added, EVI-138 to EVI-147. They rest on the City of Copenhagen's case 2026-0272339, Festival site - Dialogue with Live Nation, released under freedom of information to Knud Erik Hansen on 9 September 2026 and shared with us on 11 September. The material covers the period from September 2023 to June 2026 and is the first consolidated documentation of the city's dialogue with the festival promoter about a new festival site. No earlier statement on the site was wrong. New material has come in, and the campaign's internal rule that the relationship with the promoter was undocumented has been rewritten, because it no longer holds.

EVI-138 · EVI-139 · EVI-140 · EVI-141 · EVI-142 · EVI-143 · EVI-144 · EVI-145 · EVI-146 · EVI-147

Two letters were sent to the Danish Nature Agency in the case concerning sub-area 2. The text about the outstanding points in the 12 August request has been rewritten, because the decision of 1 September answered one of the three points: the Vestamager management plan for 2021 to 2025 remains the plan in force under section 15 of the conservation order, and no new plan is being prepared. Two points remain unanswered and were chased the same day. A new request has been registered, SPG-014, for the six documents from case 24/04711 that the agency withheld in full. No earlier statement was wrong. Something that was open has been answered, and a new question has been asked.

The Finance Administration has stated that the request of 31 July 2026 was not handled as a freedom-of-information request. Two places on the site have been rewritten as a result. Under the response deadline for the request about the event site it said: „The request was made under both acts, and the decision of 25 August 2026 does not state which of them it was taken under. Under the Access to Public Administration Files Act the deadline would be 11 August, under the Environmental Information Act 31 August.“ It now says that there is no deadline to count, because the city states that no decision was taken under either act. On the four document pages from 25 August the source was given as „decision of 25 August 2026 on the freedom-of-information request of 31 July 2026“. It now reads „reply of 25 August 2026 to the enquiry of 31 July 2026“, with the earlier wording kept on the page. Neither was wrong when it was written. The letter answered a request that expressly invoked two acts, and it did not itself state that it was not a decision. We have not had the city's assessment tested, and we do not claim that it is wrong.

EVI-110 · EVI-104 · EVI-105 · EVI-106 · EVI-107

A sentence has been removed from the page about the request concerning the event site. It read: „The case number has still not been given.“ That was true, and it still is. But the sentence read as if the city were withholding something, and there is no basis for that. The Finance Administration stated the same day that the enquiry was not handled as a freedom-of-information request, and a question to the administration is not necessarily filed as a case with a number. If there is no case, there is no number to give. We do not know whether that is the explanation here, so the page now says nothing rather than implying something.

EVI-110

The Danish Nature Agency replied to the complaint about its refusal of 21 August. It writes that the decision and the reasons for it will be reviewed again, and that it expects to come back on 1 September 2026. Until today the register stated that no date had been given for the points left unanswered. There is a date now, and it is on the page.

The front page theme on species gained two caveats that were missing: that the ranking second of 45 applies to breeding birds, that measured on overall species richness the locality ranks 19th of 57, and that both figures apply to the city's 44.2 hectare monitoring locality, not the whole golf course.

EVI-101

The city's decision on the request about the event venue arrived. Four new documents in the archive: no decision on a final extent and no map annexes, no decision on the number of event days, no noise calculations for the site, and the administration's own statement that the June case took no decision on siting.

EVI-104 · EVI-105 · EVI-106 · EVI-107

The city's geodata for the monitoring locality arrived. Five layers, including the locality boundary of 44.18 hectares and a bird layer with a single reference point for the whole locality.

EVI-029

The city's raw data from the baseline monitoring arrived: 86 records, 70 species, fieldwork in 2024 and 2025. These are the data that made three of the corrections on 26 August necessary.

EVI-100 · EVI-101

The Danish Nature Agency released the management plan for sub-areas 2, 3 and 4, the full lease with addenda, and correspondence. The agency stated that it has not assessed the occurrence of Annex IV species on the area in connection with this case.

EVI-079 · EVI-086

The city's correspondence with the tenant was released in full. It shows that the administration was working on a festival venue on the site from December 2024, eleven months before the political proposal.

EVI-093 · EVI-094 · EVI-095 · EVI-096