Kalvebodkilen · protected state land

An event venue for up to 60,000 people on protected nature

The site lies between Amager Fælled and Kalvebod Fælled, right next to Ørestad. It is owned by the state, protected since 1990, and leased until 2047. On 25 June 2026 the Copenhagen City Council voted 52 to 3 to proceed. The city budget is finally adopted on 1 October.

Write to a council member See the documents

This page is in English. Hele sitet og arkivet er på dansk, because the sources are.

The goal
The survey must exist before the plan is drawn

We are not asking for the funding to be undone, and we are not asking anyone to leave the budget agreement. We are asking for the order of things. The 2027 budget agreement sets aside 2.4 million kroner for a functional programme for the site, and the agreement itself requires that programme to survey particularly vulnerable and endangered species on the golf course. But the budget memo the money was costed on does not commission a survey of species. The words for species and Annex IV do not appear in it, and its nature section is a screening for habitat types, not for species. Nothing anywhere says what the survey must cover, who is to carry it out, or when it must be ready. That is the gap the demand closes, and it changes no figure.

The demand, in the original Danish: At midlerne under ØK49 og ØK49b anvendes på følgende betingelser:
  1. A. At der ikke fastlægges placering, byggefelter, kapacitet, belysning, afvanding eller adgangsveje, hverken politisk eller administrativt, og at funktionsprogrammet ikke forelægges til politisk beslutning, før den kortlægning af særligt sårbare og truede arter på golfbanearealet, som budgetaftalen selv bestiller, foreligger.
  2. B. At kortlægningen
    1. udføres af en uvildig fagbiolog uden tilknytning til projektet,
    2. omfatter padder, krybdyr og flagermus, herunder arter omfattet af habitatdirektivets bilag IV, som kommunens hidtidige monitering af lokaliteten ikke dækker,
    3. følger de tekniske anvisninger for overvågning af de pågældende artsgrupper fra Institut for Ecoscience ved Aarhus Universitet, herunder A17B for padder og A04 for flagermus, og dermed gennemføres i de registreringsperioder og med de metoder, anvisningerne fastsætter, og over mere end én sæson, og
    4. offentliggøres i sin helhed, rapport såvel som rådata, senest samtidig med at funktionsprogrammet forelægges.
  3. C. At kommissorium, tidsplan og udbudsmateriale for funktionsprogrammet forelægges Borgerrepræsentationen eller et stående udvalg, før opgaven sendes i udbud, og at det i den forbindelse oplyses, om programmet er omfattet af miljøvurderingsloven.
That the funds under ØK49 and ØK49b be used on the condition that the functional programme is not submitted for political decision until the survey of particularly vulnerable and endangered species on the golf course, which the budget agreement itself commissions, exists — and that the survey (1) is carried out by an independent professional biologist with no ties to the project, (2) covers amphibians, reptiles and bats, including species listed in Annex IV of the Habitats Directive, which the city’s existing monitoring of the site does not cover, (3) follows the technical monitoring guidelines issued by the Department of Ecoscience at Aarhus University for the species groups in question, among them A17B for amphibians and A04 for bats, and is therefore carried out in the recording periods and by the methods those guidelines set, across more than one season, and (4) is published in full, report and raw data alike, no later than when the functional programme is submitted.
The demand stands after the deadline. The budget agreement itself ordered a survey of particularly vulnerable and threatened species, but it did not say when the survey must be ready, or what it must cover. The budget memo states that the measure can be started without further committee treatment, and that the next political item only comes once the programme is finished at the end of 2027. If the amphibians are to be included, the survey must be commissioned before the spring of 2027. The deadline for sub-amendments passed on 23 September 2026 at 12.00. Write to one member about it.
52voted to proceed on 25 June 2026See the minutes
3voted againstSee the minutes
2047the year the lease runs to. The state cannot terminate the leaseSee the answer
2sentences on strictly protected species in the memo the politicians were given. Neither mentions a site visitSee the memo
The case
Six things the city's and the state's own papers show

Every point rests on a document written by the authorities themselves. Quotations are kept in Danish, because that is what the sources say. The English underneath is our rendering, not the source.

Politikerne · Document 001

What has been decided

On 25 June 2026 the Copenhagen City Council decided to proceed with a nature and culture park with room for up to 60,000 people on the golf course in Kalvebodkilen, the protected, state-owned land between Amager Fælled and Kalvebod Fælled. 52 voted in favour, 3 against. It is not a decision to build. It is a decision to investigate, and money for it has been requested in the 2027 budget.

Indstillingen blev godkendt efter afstemning med 52 stemmer imod 3. Ingen medlemmer undlod at stemme. For stemte: Ø, F, A, C, B, V, I og O. Imod stemte: Å og Q The recommendation was approved by a vote of 52 to 3. No members abstained. Borgerrepræsentationen, 25. juni 2026
Lejekontrakten · Document 002

The state cannot deliver the land

The land is owned by the state and leased to the golf club until 31 December 2047. The Danish Nature Agency, which owns the land and signed the contract, has stated in writing that the agreement cannot be terminated by the state, that a political wish does not in itself confer a right to terminate, and that intervening would require expropriation, a specific act of parliament, or a voluntary agreement with the tenant. The state considers itself liable for compensation. It says itself that it does not know how large that compensation would be, and its memo on the costs of a termination is withheld from freedom of information requests. The City of Copenhagen has stated that it does not know the terms of the contract.

Nej, et politisk ønske kan ikke i sig selv give staten ret til at opsige en gældende kontrakt. No, a political wish cannot in itself give the state the right to terminate a valid contract. Naturstyrelsens presseafdeling, 6. august 2026
Fredningen · Document 003

The right to walk there is protected in three places

The 1990 protection order keeps the whole area open to pedestrians. In 2023 the Conservation Board for Copenhagen refused permission to fence off the area and charge entry for up to seven days a year for a golf tournament, and in June 2025 the Environment and Food Appeals Board upheld that refusal definitively. The appeals board found that the protection order's list of ways to restrict access is exhaustive. The lease itself also forbids the tenant from closing the area's main paths, including during events.

bestemmelsen i fredningens § 8 efter klagenævnets vurdering indeholder en udtømmende oplistning af mulighederne for at begrænse offentlighedens færdsel inden for hele det fredede område in the appeals board's assessment, section 8 of the protection order contains an exhaustive list of the ways in which public access within the entire protected area may be restricted Miljø- og Fødevareklagenævnet, 3. juni 2025
Arterne · Document 004

The species were counted. They were never assessed.

The city's own survey recorded five bird species with red-list status on the site, including the black-headed gull in the endangered category. For breeding birds the site is among the five richest of 45 locations in all of Copenhagen, in joint third place. Measured on overall species richness it ranks 21st of 57, and both figures apply to the city's 44.2 hectare monitoring locality, not the whole golf course. Even so, the city's entire written assessment of strictly protected species on this particular site consists of two sentences from February 2024, based on a database lookup. On 21 August 2026 the Danish Nature Agency stated that it has not assessed the question in connection with this case. On 4 August 2026 the city stated that no species survey was planned. The 2027 budget agreement commissions one on 3 September 2026, a good two months after the decision had been taken.

Københavns Kommune har ikke kendskab til eventuelle bilag IV-arter på arealet. Der foreligger ingen nyere observationer på den nationale artsportal. The City of Copenhagen has no knowledge of any Annex IV species on the site. There are no recent observations on the national species portal. Lena Kongsbach, vicedirektør, 26. februar 2024
Fredningen · Document 005

The administration itself concluded in 2024 that it probably cannot be done

As early as 26 February 2024, the Climate, Environment and Technical Administration wrote that the city expects an exemption probably cannot be obtained, because converting the area into an event venue would conflict with the purpose of the protection order. On the protected forest on the site, the administration wrote that an exemption is considered unlikely, and that the Danish Environmental Protection Agency is the competent authority. That memo was on the table when the City Council voted two years later.

Det er imidlertid kommunens forventning, at der sandsynligvis ikke kan opnås dispensation, da omdannelse af området til festivalplads umiddelbart vil stride mod fredningens formål. It is, however, the city's expectation that an exemption probably cannot be obtained, since converting the area into an event venue would immediately conflict with the purpose of the protection order. Lena Kongsbach, vicedirektør, 26. februar 2024
Lejekontrakten · Document 006

It began before the proposal

The political proposal to find a site for a large outdoor arena was tabled on 13 November 2025. But the city's administration was already working on the golf course in December 2024. A meeting was held with the tenant on 17 January 2025, where two specific locations on the course were discussed, and where it was agreed that the tenant would inform the Danish Nature Agency of the interest.

Der er som sagt politisk interesse for en festivalplads i området og vi vil derfor gerne undersøge mulighederne for om der på den lidt længere bane vil kunne tages entré i området, der så både kunne muliggøre festival og golfturneringer. As I said, there is political interest in an event venue in the area, and we would therefore like to look into whether, in the slightly longer term, an entrance fee could be charged in the area, which would then make both a festival and golf tournaments possible. Mads Monrad Hansen, kontorchef, Team Planlægning, 20. december 2024
The sequence
What the authorities answered, and what was decided

Note the difference between an administration that investigates and an elected body that decides. They are not the same, and the timeline distinguishes them.

An authority said no Administration at work Political step Ahead
July 2023
The Conservation Board for Copenhagen refuses permission to fence off the area and charge entry for up to seven days a year.
See the document (Danish)
February 2024
The Climate, Environment and Technical Administration assesses that an exemption probably cannot be obtained, because an event venue would conflict with the purpose of the protection order.
See the document (Danish)
December 2024
The Finance Administration begins looking into an event venue on the site and writes to the tenant about it. No elected body had decided anything at that point.
See the document (Danish)
January 2025
The Finance Administration asks the tenant to inform the Danish Nature Agency of the interest in an event venue on the site.
See the document (Danish)
June 2025
The Environment and Food Appeals Board upholds the refusal definitively and calls the protection order's list of access restrictions exhaustive.
See the document (Danish)
November 2025
A member proposal in the City Council to investigate possible sites for a large outdoor arena. Five days before the local election.
See the document (Danish)
25 June 2026
The City Council votes 52 to 3 to proceed with the site.
See the document (Danish)
August 2026
The Danish Nature Agency states that the state cannot terminate the lease before 2047, and that it has not assessed strictly protected species on the site.
See the document (Danish)
1 October 2026
The 2027 budget is finally adopted at its second reading.
The words
The same word, nine years apart

Both quotations are the Lord Mayor's own public words. We have added nothing.

2017
Det er enormt vigtigt, at vi politikere kæmper for hver eneste grønne kvadratmeter i byen og på den måde værner om de åndehuller, der er så vigtige for os alle sammen. It is enormously important that we politicians fight for every single green square metre in the city, and in that way protect the breathing spaces that matter so much to all of us.
Sisse Marie Welling, as a candidate · EVI-007
2026
I København skal der selvfølgelig være plads til store koncerter – og det kan vi få med den her nye festivalplads med plads til 60.000 gæster. Samtidig er det virkelig godt, at pladsen også kan fungere som et grønt og naturskønt åndehul i hverdagen. In Copenhagen there should of course be room for large concerts, and we can have that with this new festival site with room for 60,000 guests. At the same time it is really good that the site can also serve as a green and scenic breathing space in everyday life.
Sisse Marie Welling, Lord Mayor, on the day of the vote · EVI-008
The parties that have spoken did not hide their position. The Red-Green Alliance wrote about a possible event venue on the site as early as October 2025, before the local election, and repeated it in a formal statement on the day of the vote. We do not think anyone concealed anything. We place the words side by side because they are public, and let the reader decide the rest.
The vote
All 55 seats voted. None abstained, none were absent

Eight party letters voted in favour, two against.

Why there are no names here. The City Council's minutes record how the parties voted, not how individual members voted. We therefore do not put names to a vote the minutes do not contain.

Ask for one answer before the job is tendered

The 2027 budget agreement orders a survey of particularly vulnerable and threatened species on the golf course site. It does not say when. The state's own technical guidelines place the recording of amphibians between 20 March and 20 April and the search for bats between 20 June and 1 August. Look outside those periods and you find nothing.

Ask one council member to put one question to the administration: when the survey is to be carried out, whether it covers amphibians and bats in those periods, and whether it must be ready before the functional programme is drawn up. The answer is public, and it can come before the contract is signed.

This is not a demand to drop the project. It is a demand for the order of things: investigate before anything is fixed.

Anyone living in the Municipality of Copenhagen can write to a council member. You do not need to be a Danish citizen. The tool is in Danish, and so is the draft letter, which is deliberate: a letter in Danish to a Danish politician gets read.

Write to a council member
The archive
162 documents, each with its source

The archive is in Danish. Every finding has its own page with the source, the page number and the verbatim quotation, and a short note on what the document does not prove. If something is wrong, write to kontakt@faelledsporet.dk and it will be corrected within a day, with the correction left standing.

Open the archive (Danish) · Forsiden på dansk

Share it with someone who lives here

The case is not secret. It is just hard to find. Most people in Copenhagen do not know the site exists, and very few know a vote has been held on it.

There is no tracking on these buttons. They are ordinary links. Nothing is sent to anyone until you click yourself.

Instagram does not allow a link to be shared from outside. Use the copy button and paste it yourself.